Missing

Information About the Artwork

Reclining Woman VI

by Pablo Picasso

About

  • Length: 21.50 inches
  • Width: 28.75 inches
  • Material: Oil on Canvass
  • Defining Marks: Label in Rear: Homage to Picasso October 1971 Marlborough Gallery Inc. Saidenberg Gallery, Inc.

Do you have something to share with us?

Tell us what you know about the missing artworks.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
269 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
pusang gala
pusang gala
1 year ago

the painting has resurfaced today.
video from imee marcos herself.

Ho Leee Sheet
Ho Leee Sheet
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

Did imelda marcos stole it?

painting disappeared then resurfaced lol...
painting disappeared then resurfaced lol...
1 year ago
Reply to  Ho Leee Sheet

Marcos family is known for theivery, so… 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

Henlo
Henlo
1 year ago

to be fair and accurate, marcos family use ill gotten wealth to buy artworks.

secret
secret
1 year ago
Reply to  Henlo

proof?

_no
_no
1 year ago
Reply to  Pollux

so a tweet is enough proof?

hinagpis
hinagpis
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

Civil Case No. 0141
Republic of the Philippines vs. Ferdinand Marcos (rep. by his heirs) and Imelda Marcos

Under “Marcos’ Collection of Paintings”
On December 19, 2019 –  Sandiganbayan where the latter declared the following paintings and artworks as unlawfully acquired, and are therefore forfeited in favor of the Republic…

SOURCE: https://www.foi.gov.ph/requests/aglzfmVmb2ktcGhyHgsSB0NvbnRlbnQiEVBDR0ctNTMxOTQ5ODA5MjU5DA

good enough?

Fvckcheaker
Fvckcheaker
1 year ago
Reply to  hinagpis

You didn’t even checked if it’s the original or not.. It was said that the original painting was not found rather it was just a mere replica

Randomguy
Randomguy
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

The artwork is listed as missing. Then see it on the news, hanging on their wall. Proof? 🤦

Juju
Juju
1 year ago
Reply to  Randomguy

Spot the difference, lol it’s not the same. It’s clearly a replica

hhhh
hhhh
1 year ago
Reply to  Juju

if its a replica then why do they need to hide when PCGG went to inspect their property?

Farren
Farren
1 year ago
Reply to  hhhh

Because the PCGG might make up stories. We know how crooked the people of Cory are.

Fred
Fred
1 year ago
Reply to  Farren

Cory is dead you idiot

Just a person
1 year ago
Reply to  hhhh

Why

Just a person
1 year ago
Reply to  hhhh

Why would they be so un aware and careless then post it if they are really trying to hide the painting?

Happy
Happy
1 year ago
Reply to  Juju

AGREE!! I CHECKED IT TOO!

Jammy Lunasin
Jammy Lunasin
1 year ago
Reply to  Juju

Its the same from the KingMaker film, but from the latest video posted it’s clearly a replica I have proof, they’re hiding it now

Hanso
Hanso
1 year ago
Reply to  Juju

I agree. It’s clearly a replica!

Marie
Marie
1 year ago
Reply to  Juju

You think Imelda would settle down for a replica?she has taste and it’s her trademark..

Neri
Neri
1 year ago
Reply to  Juju

Ang pumikit ay di na magmumulat

BobongMarcos
BobongMarcos
1 year ago
Reply to  Henlo

lol, it will not be tagged missing if it was bought.

Aguy
Aguy
1 year ago
Reply to  Henlo

They are the one who’s being robbed

the investigator
the investigator
1 year ago
Reply to  Henlo

any solid proof?

reform
reform
1 year ago
Reply to  Henlo

Does the ill gotten wealth was proven na po ba? To be fair and accurate. As far as I know, it was all dismiss.

Madapaka
1 year ago

she is the owner and in 2015 the government announced that it will launch a crowd-sourcing website in an attempt to recover the artworks.

Therese
Therese
1 year ago
Reply to  Madapaka

Hi, you’re already in PCGG’s ‘the missing art movement’, meaning nakaw po yan. That’s the sole reason why they created this website – so the people can help if there’s any possibly sightings. Baka po nabiktima ka ng fake news.

secret
secret
1 year ago

wow proof please?

Pink
Pink
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

Noo! they’re spreading fakenews without the legal movement. Judgement is far from the immediately accusations and no proof, lol. You think they will burn them selves with thier on fire? Hahahaha.

Guesswho
Guesswho
1 year ago
Reply to  Pink

The painting is way to visible in the latest captured video inside Imelda marcos house

Jzeje
Jzeje
1 year ago
Reply to  Pink

They just did

tweet
tweet
1 year ago
Reply to  Pink

They believe in Andy Bautista narrative who is Andy B by the way where is he ? the accusation of his wife that he has a tons of money, and yet he flew instead of facing it

Last edited 1 year ago by tweet
neil tristan yabut
neil tristan yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

the picture is the proof. huwag tanga

unknown
unknown
1 year ago

Bobo tignan mo yung red lines sa baba, magka-iba puro ka dada ayaw mo tignan maigi.

Sien
Sien
1 year ago
Reply to  unknown

I think same lang kasi cropted yung picture kaya blurred which taken from the picture of Imelda. Enlighten me pls, tnkx.

unknown
unknown
1 year ago
Reply to  Sien

and also iba yung frame na ginamit kaya nag nukhanh maiksi yung red and yellow colors

iny
iny
1 year ago
Reply to  unknown

bulag ka ata eh

Ram
Ram
1 year ago
Reply to  unknown

stop referring to urself, tingnang mabuti same photo but different frame

Fujj
Fujj
1 year ago
Reply to  Ram

https://news.artnet.com/art-world/imelda-marcos-missing-art-philippines-373709/amp-page
Plss click the link, and try to screenshot the picture.Then icrop mo, makikita mo na same lang yung picture sa taas at yung picture sa link.

Thanks

iny
iny
1 year ago
Reply to  Ram

no

Happy
Happy
1 year ago
Reply to  iny

KUNG HINDI KA ARTIST WAG MO NG IPILIT !!! NAPAKA DAMI NG DIFFERENCE.

iny
iny
1 year ago
Reply to  Ram

hhahahahah bulag ka ba

Nevermind
Nevermind
1 year ago
Reply to  Ram

right

Nevermind
Nevermind
1 year ago
Reply to  unknown

So you’re telling me/us na gumagamit ang mga Marcos ng Pekeng gamit? LOL

Happy
Happy
1 year ago
Reply to  Nevermind

EH KAHIT NGA SHOES COLLECTION NA GAWANG MARIKINA, NAPAKA BIG DEAL AT ISSUE NA SA INYO!?

robert
robert
1 year ago
Reply to  Happy

The shoes are a mix of local and imported brands — pairs by Ferragamo, Givenchy, Chanel, Christian Dior, Charles Jourdan and Bally, along with well-known local brands.

reform
reform
1 year ago
Reply to  robert

Lol. It’s no surprise she have those brand, first lady received various gift from other country they visit ni FEM. But she’s promoting local made from Philippines everytime.

They think she’s very fashionable and would appreciate a gift.

robert
robert
1 year ago
Reply to  Nevermind

no way!

Lucio
Lucio
1 year ago
Reply to  unknown

Yep di nga katulad they just make this for propaganda

Anonymous
Anonymous
1 year ago

true. hanggang dito, umaatake troll farm nila.

Leni robredog
1 year ago

Ikaw mas tanga, ugaling robredog asong ulol.

Shai
1 year ago

Replica po yun🫰🏻

Marie
Marie
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

Ask them to allow PCGG to scrutinize the painting in front of the public to be fair

kalma emman lang to
kalma emman lang to
1 year ago

evidence pleeeeeeeeeease 🤣

ricz
ricz
1 year ago

pwede kac magbasa…may nagbigay na nga ng link..diyos miyo eto tayo….may court order na lahat lahat naghahanap parin ng evidence…sorry ndi nmn kaya magbigay ng tiktok link

Coco
Coco
1 year ago

Before you utter such words make it sure First if you have evidence

magaral kasi
magaral kasi
1 year ago

“steal” not stole bobo naman.

NurseMj
NurseMj
1 year ago

ha? it was gift to imelda marcos when she was first lady.

the investigator
the investigator
1 year ago
Reply to  NurseMj

agree. si leni nga diba ganun kadami natanggap within the campaign period, what more si imelda na first lady for how many years?

the investigator
the investigator
1 year ago

Proof?

Jocelyn
Jocelyn
1 year ago

Lol have you seen the different with the original and replicate copy that lady Emelda Marcos have you fool use your eyes not mouth stupid

Kuya Etot
Kuya Etot
1 year ago

ULOL! 🤣🤣

Aaaa
Aaaa
1 year ago

Have seen the missing and the one in Imelda’s it seems Imelda’s has the reproduce one

Fascinate23
Fascinate23
1 year ago
Reply to  Ho Leee Sheet

They brought it illegally using Philippine people’s tax

secret
secret
1 year ago
Reply to  Fascinate23

proof?

5 thieves
5 thieves
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

why do you keep asking for proof? Are you that lazy to search about it yourself the Marcoses’ History are all over google and twitter

Annamed
Annamed
1 year ago
Reply to  5 thieves

The fact that u used the word twitter is literally a red flag brooo

Mon
Mon
1 year ago
Reply to  Annamed

Nani?

unknown
unknown
1 year ago
Reply to  5 thieves

HAHAHAHA stupid, using Twitter as reliable source?

Jane
Jane
1 year ago
Reply to  5 thieves

We already do our research regarding Marcoses’ History and we could say that all accusations to Marcos family are coming from bias media who twisted and manipulated everything to make the Marcoses bad. You people always tell that Marcos’ are “magnanakaw” yet the Supreme Court didn’t even convict them. Binasura ang mga cases nila. I believe there’s due process for that case and if they are really magnanakaw then why until now binabasura parin ng Supreme Court ang case nila? If you want us to believe your accusations and all opinions or I must say black propagandas against Marcoses then drop some proofs atleast.

Urielle Suarez
1 year ago
Reply to  Jane

It is a unique painting that went missing nga eh, made by Pablo Picasso himself. This painting is being searched ano ba mahirap intindihin don . No one can replicate a painting if it went missing common sense
Biased kasi Supreme Court sa US may kaso. Stop being cringe.

Farren
Farren
1 year ago
Reply to  Urielle Suarez

LoL anong no one can create a replica??? Bago pa naging missing yan May picture na yan. Yan na nga oh yung picture bago naging missing.

Randall Shelton
1 year ago
Reply to  Jane

Bakit may kaso sa US. Baka biased supreme court? Tinging tingin lang pag may time.

Tigilan ang kabobohan
Tigilan ang kabobohan
1 year ago
Reply to  Jane

Did kasi bobo

the investigator
the investigator
1 year ago
Reply to  5 thieves

The burden of proof lies with the prosecution. The prosecution must convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty of the charges brought against them.

Unknown
Unknown
1 year ago
Reply to  5 thieves

TwItTer 🤡

OpenUrMind
OpenUrMind
1 year ago
Reply to  5 thieves

💯‼️‼️‼️

Mon
Mon
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

It is a missing artwork then it was found on Imelda Marcos’ house when Bbm visited his mom after winning the pres. election. If it was not bought illegally, then it should not be marked as missing. Simple logic

stewpd
stewpd
1 year ago
Reply to  Mon

Ehh, are you sure that’s a legitimate one? The picture on top does not even match the picture on their house. Take a closer look.

Jeb
Jeb
1 year ago
Reply to  stewpd

It is a unique painting that went missing nga eh, made by Pablo Picasso himself. This painting is being searched ano ba mahirap intindihin don . No one can replicate a painting if it went missing common sense

ricz
ricz
1 year ago
Reply to  Mon

they obviously bought it illegally…oh god are you using some brain? you can buy things illegally you know

Farren
Farren
1 year ago
Reply to  Mon

SI ANDY BAUTISTA LANG ANG MAY SABI NA IYAN IYON. MAS ASSUMING PA KAYO SA SUPREME COURT.

Jane
Jane
1 year ago
Reply to  Fascinate23

Before you tell such accusations, can you atleast drop proofs/evidences?

Happy
Happy
1 year ago
Reply to  Fascinate23

YOU CAN OBVIOUSLY SPOT THE DIFFERENCE! MEAN YUNG PAINTING NA YUN NASA KANILA IS JUST A REPLICA..

the investigator
the investigator
1 year ago
Reply to  Fascinate23

any solid evidence?

Pink
Pink
1 year ago
Reply to  Ho Leee Sheet

Noo! they’re spreading fakenews without the legal movement. Judgement is far from the immediately accusations and no proof, lol. You think they will burn them selves with thier own fire? Hahahaha.

Mon
Mon
1 year ago
Reply to  Pink

Ha?

Pogs
Pogs
1 year ago
Reply to  Pink

Ambush/ surprise visit. Forgot abt the painting lol

Last edited 1 year ago by Pogs
Ram
Ram
1 year ago
Reply to  Pink

you will burn urself paid troll

dreamcakes
dreamcakes
1 year ago
Reply to  Ho Leee Sheet

“Robert Sison said that the paintings were not included in a forfeiture case which the Philippine government brought against the Marcos family more than a decade ago.”
https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-29427876

Irene Meisle
Irene Meisle
1 year ago
Reply to  Ho Leee Sheet

Yes. We are now run by admin of thieves

Donn
Donn
1 year ago
Reply to  Ho Leee Sheet

Nope, she just displayed it in her living room

Watdapak
Watdapak
1 year ago
Reply to  Ho Leee Sheet

the one in Imelda’s house is FAKE. hahaha! bintang pa more.

https://www.facebook.com/forthemotherlandph/photos/a.294984410867212/1791663257865979/

OpenUrMind
OpenUrMind
1 year ago
Reply to  Watdapak

FaCeBoOk 🚩🤪🙃

Happyguy
Happyguy
1 year ago
Reply to  Ho Leee Sheet

no…they bought it

Yagityawa
Yagityawa
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

Two different piece. If you look closely. So which is which

LeniKiko
LeniKiko
1 year ago
Reply to  Yagityawa

You’re right. I checked after reading your comment and magkaiba nga.

LeniKiko
LeniKiko
1 year ago
Reply to  LeniKiko

But then if you check an older photo, probably from the film, the Kingmaker, super similar sa original. Link here: https://news.artnet.com/art-world/imelda-marcos-missing-art-philippines-373709/amp-page

The painting posted today vs what appeared in the film, both in Imelda’s possession, are different.

So conclusion here is: they have 2 copies of the painting. The fake and the real thing.

josirius
josirius
1 year ago
Reply to  LeniKiko

iisa sila. yung frame lang ang naiba. sa pic sa kingmaker, mas wide yung sides ng frame kaya malaki area na covered, nabawasan buhok at sa paa nya. yung sa galing kay imee mas manipis yung frame.

LeniKiko
LeniKiko
1 year ago
Reply to  josirius

Focus on the lines on the lower portion of the painting. Yung photo from today, longer yung lines compared sa nagappear sa film and sa legit painting.

Bea
Bea
1 year ago
Reply to  josirius

I agree. They changed the frame. Same painting.

Pink
Pink
1 year ago
Reply to  Bea

Hah? Hahaha Noo! they’re spreading fakenews without the legal movement. Judgement is far from the immediately accusations and no proof, lol. You think they will burn them selves with thier on fire? Hahahaha.

Trutheprevails
Trutheprevails
1 year ago
Reply to  Pink

You’re just one of BBM trolls clearly you’re here to protect them from the truth.

robert
robert
1 year ago
Reply to  Trutheprevails

lol! 31 million daw yan (sa loob nang SD card)

Last edited 1 year ago by robert
Recel
Recel
1 year ago
Reply to  Bea

No i think it’s not. Sa kingmaker Fake un look closely sa strokes ng pag paint, sa latest un na yung totoo di na nila tinago or vice versa? I’m not sure

Last edited 1 year ago by Recel
basta timang nyo talaga
basta timang nyo talaga
1 year ago
Reply to  Bea

binasa mo ba maigi? di mo ata naintindihan

Yagityawa
Yagityawa
1 year ago
Reply to  Bea

Iba yan. Tignan mo angle ng 2nd line from the right. So alin jan ang totoo o hindi

basta timang nyo talaga
basta timang nyo talaga
1 year ago
Reply to  josirius

edi hindi magkaparehas.. diba?

basta timang nyo talaga
basta timang nyo talaga
1 year ago
Reply to  LeniKiko

malamang dun din galing mismo yung picture from the source. hindi ka ba nag tataka pati yung shadow ng halaman sa kanan is nandun din sa picture from the source na naka crop lang kaya lumabo ng ganyan.. hayss mga pilipinong ‘to ang bilis nyo mapaniwala mga timang

JenCas
JenCas
1 year ago
Reply to  LeniKiko

Nope. The link you sent is the same as the replica. I dont know how you guys check legitimacy of art pieces but this is a very simple task. Check the curvatures of the red lines of the original vs the replica, check the green curve line below. Check the blending of the colors, check the quality. Sa red lines palang alam mo nang magkaiba. I’m not a professional myself but i’m a fan of paintings. Napaka eng eng nalang ng magsabing magkatulad ang bagay na halatang magkaiba. Check it very very carefully.

ShainingTao
ShainingTao
1 year ago
Reply to  LeniKiko
Last edited 1 year ago by ShainingTao
painting disappeared then resurfaced lol...
painting disappeared then resurfaced lol...
1 year ago
Reply to  Yagityawa

It can be the same one because painings may or may not be deteriorate over time… Also, if they want themselves to be cleared of suspicion (which I highly doubt), then they would let the PCGG investigate or confiscate the painting on the wall :/

P.S: It puzzles me as to why they would have a replica of the painting they’ve stole.

Bea
Bea
1 year ago
Reply to  Yagityawa

They’re the same. They only changed the frame. Kingmaker and this photo has thicker frame (I guess the original frame). Current frame seen in TV Patrol is thinner.

Ais
Ais
1 year ago
Reply to  Bea

Not the same painting, look at the 2 circles and the lines in the bottom. Obviously not the same. Marcos has 2 different paintings real and fake.

Last edited 1 year ago by Ais
Geegeehadhid
Geegeehadhid
1 year ago
Reply to  Yagityawa

Same painting, different frame

basta timang nyo talaga
basta timang nyo talaga
1 year ago
Reply to  Geegeehadhid

bobo ampota tignan mo yung mga guhit sa baba.

neil tristan yabut
neil tristan yabut
1 year ago
Reply to  Yagityawa

really? you figured out that out from your vantage point?

Shnookums
Shnookums
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

Magkaiba po tingnan nyo po maigi sa upper part

basta timang nyo talaga
basta timang nyo talaga
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

buksan nyo ngang mabuti mata niyo. magkaiba yung details ng painting. maybe ni recreate lang yan or just a replica mga timang

Baby m
Baby m
1 year ago

Si imelda mag didisplay ng replica? Are you nuts? 😂

Neth
Neth
1 year ago

Dba its illegal to copy one’s art?

stewpd
stewpd
1 year ago
Reply to  Neth

fact check: it is legal to copy anything, whats illegal is if you sell/publish it.

Randall Shelton
1 year ago
Reply to  stewpd

Ahaha. Torrenters.

Abel
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

I won’t insist about that, the painting is actually in the Marcos’House.

MinorKiddobutknowsEVERYTHING.
Reply to  pusang gala
Last edited 1 year ago by MinorKiddobutknowsEVERYTHING.
Lil
Lil
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

It was already confirmed to be at imeldas house even last year, that cropped pic is from that picture, idk why they are declaring it as missing we know where it is.

Fakenews
Fakenews
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

Bobo nakapaglaro ka na ba ng spot the difference? Kahit kami dito sa bahay meron kaming replica non mas maliit eh, iba din itsura sa orig na ginawa ni Picasso, so ninakaw din namin?

mamamo
mamamo
1 year ago
Reply to  Fakenews

Pablo Picasso died 1973. therefore, it was 49 years ago.
according to research, you are allowed to replicate an artwork only if the artist died over 50 years.
in conclusion, replicate or not, it is illegal & knowing that this artwork is missing. Parehas na parehas yung artwork are you blind? I’m an artist kaya wag ka nagmamarunong

JenCas
JenCas
1 year ago
Reply to  mamamo

Funny cause im not even a professional artist but i can see the difference without straining my eyes 🤔

OpenUrMind
OpenUrMind
1 year ago
Reply to  Fakenews

OmO ikaw may sabi niyan. mana-mana 🧐🤪

Happy
Happy
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

JUST A REPLICA!, AS AN ARTIST WE CAN OBVIOUSLY SPOT A LOT OF DIFFERENCE.

Xian Mikhael Puelong
Xian Mikhael Puelong
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

It doen’t even look alike, how can you blame someone that they stole a painting that doen’t even look like it.

Lulay
Lulay
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

Compare the two. The one in their mansion is just a replica. Even a gradeschooler can see the difference.

Hanso
Hanso
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

It’s just a replica. Look at the fine details if you have such a good eye for art.

reform
reform
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

Lol, it’s obvious na andaming pagkakaiba

phinoy22
phinoy22
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

gago biktima ka ng fake news..Reproduction copy lang yung nakita

Chacha
Chacha
1 year ago
Reply to  pusang gala

Please compare. It looks like a copy, there are slight differences from this to the on the video.

Bea
Bea
1 year ago

Hi! The painting resurfaced yesterday (May 11, 2022). Aired on TV Patrol when BBM visited Imelda. Photos were provided by Imee Marcos herself. Please see link.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrdO-87pe7g

Russel
Russel
1 year ago
Reply to  Bea

What time in the video shows the photo

marcos tuta
marcos tuta
1 year ago
Reply to  Russel
JePoy
JePoy
1 year ago

Magkaiba sila. Check detail per detail nung artwork. Aside from pinalitan yung frame.

basta timang nyo talaga
basta timang nyo talaga
1 year ago
Reply to  JePoy

yup. ewan ko ba dito sa mga to. akala ko ba magaling sila sa mga facts? tapos simpleng differences lang ng details sa painting hindi pa ma figure out mga timang hahahaha

Aries
Aries
1 year ago

trolls

OpenUrMind
OpenUrMind
1 year ago
Reply to  Aries

Sila ba yung galing sa 2.5 million pesos? 😆

Bobo Marcos
Bobo Marcos
1 year ago

It’s the same painting. Different frames and different lighting.

Dubidubidapdap
Dubidubidapdap
1 year ago
Reply to  Bobo Marcos

True mga inutil e

Karen
Karen
1 year ago
Reply to  Bobo Marcos

Edi nakaw nga yung isa magkaibang frame eh HAHAHA

Zed febrer
Zed febrer
1 year ago
Reply to  Bobo Marcos

As an artist, sa pag check ko ng paintings na yan, mag kaiba sila. Magkaiba details sa lower part.

Jocelyn
Jocelyn
1 year ago
Reply to  Bobo Marcos

No they are not the same😅 my god have you seen the difference between the two😂😂 how desperate kakampink

ehem
ehem
1 year ago
Reply to  JePoy

fyi, instead using your opinion for spot the difference. Try to search it, Mrs Marcos is said to be a keen art collector. Why would she get a fake one? https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-29427876

Yagityawa
Yagityawa
1 year ago
Reply to  ehem

Jusmiyo tignan mo lahat ng strokes galing sa baba. Left to right.

Ang pinapalabas kasi pinagmumuka tayong tanga na harap harapan bna binalandra yung painting after mawala.

Nakita mo ba ang narrative ng post ng fb?

Magkaiba sila pero pinapalabas nila na pareho lang yung painting. Tapos.

ehem
ehem
1 year ago
Reply to  Yagityawa

Did you read the link that I attached?
State spokesman Nick Suarez confirmed that a number of pieces of art had been removed from Marcos properties, but they “have yet to determine which ones or how many”. It was said that around 150 painting was there, and there are missing pieces.

And you are making a story that those painting is just a replica?
Do you have a source of that?

yup
yup
1 year ago
Reply to  JePoy

I think the reaurfacing of the painting just calls for an investigation if this is legit or not. If he’s innocent then no problem. If he’s not, then it proves he’s a thief. Why so defensive?

AntiMarcos
AntiMarcos
1 year ago

Please see this link:

comment image?_nc_cat=1&ccb=1-6&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_eui2=AeEyaPc4GBSZdNv_NcMW5_xeHoDiLTQGDl4egOItNAYOXmFKvlor-RsrW5uPPOFo_ot4jArSVZL1_mkRcdPGgkbY&_nc_ohc=RxLU9ginbHEAX_li9TB&tn=A-mDkCqYKQl30iQ6&_nc_ht=scontent.fmnl30-2.fna&oh=00_AT9tivlSVsHtQCnKSRUvgMs3Ci5SDIGqCk9WdvTio7MywQ&oe=62808985

secret
secret
1 year ago

if not proven stolen please stop on bashing them omg kayo

Aiel
Aiel
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

isa nanamang tao ang sarado ang utak

MarcosNotAHero
MarcosNotAHero
1 year ago
Reply to  Aiel

pinasok na rin ng troll itong tread na to. lol

Yen
Yen
1 year ago
Reply to  MarcosNotAHero

mas mukha ka pang troll beh, ‘wag papatalo

Pink
Pink
1 year ago
Reply to  Aiel

Sarado agad utak? Bugok. Wala pa mang legal movement na ginagawa ikaw sarado utak be. Masyado kang nagmamagaling edi kung napatunayan edi laklakin mo paintings jusko..

basta timang nyo talaga
basta timang nyo talaga
1 year ago
Reply to  Aiel

ikaw sarado utak.. sarado pa pati mata. simpleng difference lang sa details ng painting di mo pa mapansin pota.

vyeagraa
vyeagraa
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

and if they’re proven to be true u better be ashamed of yourself

what the actual fuck
what the actual fuck
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

what the hell. hanggang dito ba naman?

hinagpis
hinagpis
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

again

Civil Case No. 0141
Republic of the Philippines vs. Ferdinand Marcos (rep. by his heirs) and Imelda Marcos

Under “Marcos’ Collection of Paintings”
On December 19, 2019 – Sandiganbayan where the latter declared the following paintings and artworks as unlawfully acquired, and are therefore forfeited in favor of the Republic…

SOURCE: https://www.foi.gov.ph/requests/aglzfmVmb2ktcGhyHgsSB0NvbnRlbnQiEVBDR0ctNTMxOTQ5ODA5MjU5DA

THINK
THINK
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

magkano bayad sayo? 60K?

THINK
THINK
1 year ago
Reply to  THINK

Hi lang sa mga tropa mong trolls. Sana masaya nakayo sa perang tinanggap niyo.

Dubidubidapdap
Dubidubidapdap
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

MAGKANO BAYAD SAYO?

Last edited 1 year ago by Dubidubidapdap
Jane
Jane
1 year ago
Reply to  secret

Tama. May due process lahat yan. Need to undergo investigation first to prove that they really stole it. Wag naman sana sarado utak mga people. Makapang bash lang ih.

mathilde
mathilde
1 year ago

If the painting that recently resurfaced on the news is really speculated as the missing piece, it should be investigated. But the question is, will the authorities act on it? Now that a Marcos is to be proclaimed as president?

And speaking of replicas, yes, they can make one like what they did to the Golden Buddha.

Pink
Pink
1 year ago
Reply to  mathilde

I agree, kasi katulad ng sinabi mo replicas could be like that kasi iba ang details if you will compare those 2 and yah they can act on it tho Marcos will be the President…

Dubidubidapdap
Dubidubidapdap
1 year ago
Reply to  Pink

It’s the same, the lighting is the reason why it looks different

Zed febrer
Zed febrer
1 year ago
Reply to  Dubidubidapdap

Artist ako. Alam ko kung base lang sa lightings na sinasabi mo. Kaso hindi. Pakatitigan mo din yung sukat ng bawat details. Lalo sa lower part. Magkaibang magkaiba.

anonymous
anonymous
1 year ago

The painting was seen in the Marcos residence

Pink
Pink
1 year ago
Reply to  anonymous

Then you will judge na agad? Besh wala pa namang investigation na na gaganap iyan na agad…

5 thieves
5 thieves
1 year ago
Reply to  Pink

Yun nga ang point eh, Dapat imbestigahan kesa sa mag tanga tanga lang ang mga tao.

Maria Aleli
Maria Aleli
1 year ago
Reply to  Pink

Sinasampal na sa mukha natin lahat na kayang kaya nilang magnakaw pero kayo umaastang walang nakikita or naririnig. Gusto niyo ng pag babago pero nag bubulagbulagan kayo. Yan ang kaibahan nyong mga panatiko ni BBM! Kaming kakampink hindi kami panatiko ni leni kung sakaling may negatibong lumabas tungkol sa kanya, kami ang unang uusig sa kanya. Hindi yun bang babash lang basta. Bukas ang isip namin sa pangit at magandang ginagawa ng kandidato namin. Eh kayo? Halos sambahin niyo na.

Enough.Is.Enough.
Enough.Is.Enough.
1 year ago
Reply to  Maria Aleli

and yet you chose to turn blind on her ‘lutang’ moments. she made a fool of herself on the campaign. wearing stupid costumes, doing absurdly idiotic ‘superhero’ videos and all of you kakampinks either ignored it or just urged her to do more of those. Yung speech nya everytime nakafocus sa ibang candidate. and what is the highlight of her rallies? her reading stupid placards na makes you (kakampinks) feel superior pero cringeworthy naman. I really tried to know and understand her as a presidential candidate pero sobrang turn off nung mga ‘terms’ na pinapasimuno ng camp nya and ng mga supporters. i had enough of hearing/reading the words ‘laylayan and resibo’ in everything you all say.

Actually, she is an okay candidate. Even good at some point. Pero i believe one of her downfalls are her supporters like you who thinks they are a hundred times better than anyone else just because other people chose a different side or still undecided. Instead na makagarner kayo ng supporter, lalo na nabawasan. You all claim she is like this and that, and she is more known and popular now than the 2016 elections, but what happened to her votes comapred to then and now? With the gained popularity and the support of those artistas, her votes didn’t even spike? And you all make fun of the celebrities on other candidates’ rallies for being unknown and has been.. e wala naman palang hatak yang mga well known artists nyo kahit pa magpatayan na mga fandom nila.

You said, ‘Bukas ang isip namin sa pangit at magandang ginagawa ng kandidato namin. Eh kayo? Halos sambahin niyo na.’How about you open you mind sa magandang nagawa or maaring gawin din ng iba? Wala pa man e jinajudge nyo na. Bias kayo lol. Kay mamaleni lang kayo open pero sa iba, nada. Not pertaining to BBm alone, other candidates as well.

At some point, you leni supporters reminds me of a cult. you look only to leni as the only savior there is. yes she is capable but, she is not the only one capable. you support more the color pink than the country itself. her rallies, people were asked to wear pink, bring pink decors, pink flags. but where is the philippines in that pink? kahit anong kulay pa ang ifront nyo, if you are not bringing the philippines with you at the back of that color, you are not for the philippines. you are for the candidate. 🙂

And one more thing, see the gap between leni and kiko’s votes? they are supposed to be a tandem. but how come only 9 million voted for kiko? lol sobrang kawawa na nga nya in his situation, lalo pa sa mga rallies niyo. either nasa likod lang, yung mga nag eendorse, si leni lang ang itataas ang kamay. si kiko parang afterthought na lang. their names are together sa campaign lang. names lang.

Enough is enough is enough

Parang kay Marcos Martial Law lutang, ousted at tumakbo sa Hawaii moments lang which people turned a blind eye on. Also wow moment. Mahaba dahil alam may reading comprehension maka-Leni meanwhile mga ka-Marcos waley kaya I have to keep this short. Para talagang kulto akala matalino mga ka-Marcos dahil alam naman na mga narcissist leaders yung naglilead ng mga kulto. Sa bagay, kapag 86 average IQ lang ang mga Filipinos malamang susceptible sila sa mga cults. Buti nga mababait mga Amerikano nakapamahay pa rin mga Marcos sa Hawaii na ibinoto ng mga 86 IQ people.
🙂
Haha pa you’re not for the philippines, you’re for the candidate pang inaalam parang hindi binoboto mga pilipino yung mga ka-barangay lang. Ahaha. Very tribal culture.

Last edited 1 year ago by Enough is enough is enough
LENILUTANG
LENILUTANG
1 year ago

Tagalog na nga ang pagconstruct, sabog pa. Manang mana sa nanay nila.

OpenUrMind
OpenUrMind
1 year ago

Ang haba pero walang sense, parang press con nung Easter Sunday 🤪

Zed febrer
Zed febrer
1 year ago
Reply to  Maria Aleli

Ah?

u suck.
u suck.
1 year ago
Reply to  anonymous

Bobohan nyo pa

Anne
Anne
1 year ago

Filipinos being desperate without any more knowledge and proofs, basta makita lang na mali kahit dimo alam kung ano ba talaga ibabato mo e lols grow up people.

basta timang nyo talaga
basta timang nyo talaga
1 year ago
Reply to  Anne

nakakatawang nakakainis nalang talaga mga katangahan, ang bilis mapaniwala ng mga pilipino nang hindi naghahanap ng katotohanan hahahaha

ube halaya
ube halaya
1 year ago
Reply to  Anne

lmao, the Marcos family is known for thievery, what do you want people to expect when they saw the missing Picasso hanging on Imelda’s wall?

Yen
Yen
1 year ago
Reply to  ube halaya

Hello, known as thievery? Kayo lang naman ang may mga pasaring na ganyan. Y not try to file a case beh, there’s legal process to that. Go tocourt and ilatag mo ang mga ebidensiya mayroon ka. Puro kayo imaginary judgments with no sense.

ube halaya
ube halaya
1 year ago
Reply to  Yen

xD as if we have a chance to speak up.

Enough is enough
1 year ago
Reply to  Yen

Papuntahin mo si BBM sa US may court na agad 🙂 pero corrupt naman ang mga Pilipino, it’ in their genes so why does it make sense for one to trust the Philippine courts? Of course corrupt people vote corrupt presidents. Kek.

Mendes
Mendes
1 year ago
Reply to  Anne

totoo beh

HelpUsGod
HelpUsGod
1 year ago

It has resurfaced again this week when Marcos Jr visited his mother during his lead in the election tally. The Election tally is questionable. The records show a statistically impossible straight linear.

Yen
Yen
1 year ago
Reply to  HelpUsGod

I bet to disagree. Even UP school already clarify abt that issue. If u still have a doubt abt election tally then file a case. Huwag tayo puro imaginary judgments. Simple math and statistics di mo kayang gawin?

Jeonjeon18
Jeonjeon18
1 year ago
Reply to  Yen

Can you please provide the link for the clarification made by a UP professor? If you’re going to look at the data, the numbers do not make any sense. It’s straight linear without any deviation or outlier. It means the percentage of change is fixed which is kinda weird since the numbers seem like predetermined. I hope you understand this.

ooppss I'm talking again
ooppss I'm talking again
1 year ago
Reply to  Jeonjeon18

so far, PPCRV already said that no irregularities happened between transmissions and ER cross checkings, if there is something irregularities inside the precinct, I think your poll watchers can give you the best answer. The straight linear is statiscally possible but still can’t be use as evidence of irregularities.

Tumindig
Tumindig
1 year ago

It’s in Imelda Marcos’ house in Makati City, Philippines.

Butaw
Butaw
1 year ago

“Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance”

Enough is enough
1 year ago
Reply to  Butaw

True pero may namatay pa rin sa drug war.

Yen
Yen
1 year ago

You keep on throwing trash, y not try to file a case abt this. It takes due process beh. If this is indeed true, well, can’t blame ppl for bashing them. However, if the outcome shows otherwise, shame for those people who bashed them.

Enough is enough
1 year ago
Reply to  Yen

Missing kasi tinanggal nung ininvestigate :). Share lang.

Dianne
Dianne
1 year ago

Please watch TheKingmaker on Netflix.

basta timang nyo talaga
basta timang nyo talaga
1 year ago
Reply to  Dianne

yung nasa 2015 source, ayan din yung nasa facebook na kumakalat. pansinin nyo yung shadow ng halaman kanan pansinin nyo yung details wag kayo magpakatangaa!!

Last edited 1 year ago by basta timang nyo talaga
Pinkisht
Pinkisht
1 year ago

True.

hinagpis
hinagpis
1 year ago

For reference here are all the “WON & ADVERSE JUDGMENTS PCGG RECOVERY of Ill-Gotten Wealth Cases (Banner or Mandate Cases)” via FOI

source: (not me) https://www.foi.gov.ph/requests/aglzfmVmb2ktcGhyHgsSB0NvbnRlbnQiEVBDR0ctNTMxOTQ5ODA5MjU5DA

On artworks:
Civil Case No. 0141
Republic of the Philippines vs. Ferdinand Marcos (rep. by his heirs) and Imelda Marcos

Under “Marcos’ Collection of Paintings”
On December 19, 2019 (Yes during Duterte admin) – Sandiganbayan where the latter declared the following paintings and artworks as unlawfully acquired, and are therefore forfeited in favor of the Republic…

“In the case of respondents, they failed to state and substantiate how they lawfully acquired the funds used to purchase the paintings. Respondents likewise failed to show proof that they had other legitimate sources of income aside from their combined salaries of $304,372.43. Hence, this sum legally and fairly serves as basis for determining the existence of a prima facie case of forfeiture of the artworks. The Court also notes that aside from respondents’ admission by silence, there were instances when respondents made express admissions as to their possession and/or ownership of the paintings and/or artworks.”


Other items included for this case ONLY:
*Malacanang Collection of Jewelry (In 2017, YES during Duterte admin again, the SC dismissed the appeal filed by the Marcoses with FINALITY)
*Arelma Funds (US)
*Swiss Deposits of 5 Marcos’ Foundations (US$658,175,373.60 as of 31 January 2002) (around 34 billion pesos)

Aries
Aries
1 year ago

Nasa marcos yan nasa news…Huli piro di kulong..na naman..

Yen
Yen
1 year ago
Reply to  Aries

File a case then. Don’t you ever jump into conclusion. There’s a legal process to that. Nagmumukha kasi kayong mga walang alam.

OpenUrMind
OpenUrMind
1 year ago
Reply to  Yen

May case na

Queen
Queen
1 year ago

Why they will stole if they really own it.
Nakalagay lang na missing kay google missing artwork na hahaha .. hindi ba pwedeng tinangal nalang sa google bitch

Aries
Aries
1 year ago
Reply to  Queen

Pwede naman tangaling kung hindi missing diba? Mahirap ba yun?

the unbeknownst
the unbeknownst
1 year ago
Reply to  Queen

Please don’t be unreasonable. If it’s identified as missing, then it means it could be stolen by someone else and those who have it now acquired the masterpiece illegally. Google is a search engine, you could either find a credible or sketchy website. Nevertheless, it’s on YOU if you can’t fact-check and classify what is fake from fact. I pity you, really. I hope you’re getting paid for being this unreasonable.

Last edited 1 year ago by the unbeknownst
Enough is enough
1 year ago
Reply to  Queen

Haha why they will stole if they really own it. Begging the question. Fallacy na agad. Next!

Aries
Aries
1 year ago

Kung hindi missing bat nasa list pa dito?

Aries
Aries
1 year ago

Kung BBM blind loyalist ka lahat ng mali sa paningin mo ay tama. Wag na makipagtalo ang against BBM.

noone
noone
1 year ago

The painting is with imelda marcos

yeah buoy
yeah buoy
1 year ago

proof? check the link.

comment image?width=1366&format=png&auto=webp&s=0b2c069d48103931d29bd44df2f6e357353ce93a

anakngfuchsia
anakngfuchsia
1 year ago

nakina Marcos po yung painting

anakngfuchsia
anakngfuchsia
1 year ago
Reply to  anakngfuchsia

wala lang. gusto ko lang ishare na hnd po siya missing. wala naman kayong gagawin para mapanagutan sila. what a world we live in

Enough is enough
1 year ago
Reply to  anakngfuchsia

Ipapamissing rin lang naman kapag iinvestigate so missing is still accurate. Nasa Marcos genes eh.